Sign In
Free Sign Up
  • English
  • Español
  • 简体中文
  • Deutsch
  • 日本語
Sign In
Free Sign Up
  • English
  • Español
  • 简体中文
  • Deutsch
  • 日本語

HNSW vs SCANN: Which Algorithm Reigns Supreme?

HNSW vs SCANN: Which Algorithm Reigns Supreme?

When delving into the realm of nearest neighbor search algorithms, selecting the optimal algorithm is paramount. The choice between HNSW vs ScaNN (opens new window) can significantly impact search efficiency and accuracy. Understanding the nuances of these algorithms is crucial for making informed decisions in data retrieval tasks.

# HNSW vs ScaNN Overview

# HNSW Algorithm

Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW) algorithm operates by constructing a hierarchical graph structure for efficient nearest neighbor searches. This structure enables fast exploration of data points by connecting them in a network. The algorithm's function involves organizing data into layers and connecting them based on similarity, creating a navigable path for search queries. Its key features include high search speed and accuracy, making it ideal for tasks requiring quick and precise results.

# ScaNN Algorithm

The Scalable Nearest Neighbors (ScaNN) algorithm, developed by Google Research (opens new window), focuses on approximate nearest neighbor search methods (opens new window). It functions by optimizing the indexing process to enhance query efficiency. By structuring data points effectively and prioritizing index build time, ScaNN offers rapid access to relevant vectors during searches. Key features of ScaNN include faster vector queries and efficient indexing techniques.

# Performance Comparison

When comparing HNSW vs ScaNN in terms of speed, accuracy, and scalability, distinct differences emerge that cater to varying search requirements.

# Speed

In terms of query time, ScaNN stands out by handling roughly twice as many queries (opens new window) per second for a given accuracy compared to other libraries. This exceptional performance showcases its efficiency in rapid data retrieval tasks. On the other hand, HNSW exhibits impressive speed due to its hierarchical graph structure, enabling swift exploration of data points during searches.

# Query Time

  • ScaNN: Handles a significantly higher number of queries per second for a given level of accuracy.

  • HNSW: Utilizes a hierarchical graph structure for fast exploration of data points.

# Index Build Time

  • ScaNN: Prioritizes index build time optimization for enhanced query efficiency.

  • HNSW: Offers incremental updates for immediate searching capabilities.

# Accuracy

When it comes to accuracy metrics such as recall rates (opens new window) and precision, both algorithms showcase their strengths. While HNSW is known for its high search speed and accuracy, ScaNN achieves remarkable results by combining various techniques (opens new window) like quantization (opens new window) and vector decomposition (opens new window).

# Recall Rates

  • HNSW: Connects semantically similar content within a target neighborhood for accurate results.

  • ScaNN: Maintains high search accuracy through innovative techniques like quantization and vector decomposition.

# Precision

  • HNSW: Provides precise results with its hierarchical navigable small-world approach.

  • ScaNN: Enhances precision through efficient indexing methods and fast vector queries.

# Scalability

In handling large datasets and incremental updates, the two algorithms offer unique advantages based on specific requirements. While HNSW excels in managing large vectors efficiently, ScaNN proves beneficial for scenarios requiring faster indexing processes.

# Handling Large Datasets

  • HNSW: Demonstrates better tradeoff with large vectors due to its hierarchical graph structure.

  • ScaNN: Efficiently handles large datasets with optimized indexing techniques.

# Incremental Updates

  • HNSW: Allows incremental updates for immediate searching capabilities.

  • ScaNN: Offers faster indexing processes without compromising search efficiency or accuracy.

# Use Cases

# HNSW Applications

Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW) finds practical application in real-time search scenarios, where immediate access to relevant data is crucial. By structuring data points into a hierarchical graph (opens new window), HNSW swiftly navigates through vast datasets to provide quick and accurate results. This algorithm's efficiency in handling large-scale data sets makes it a valuable tool for applications requiring rapid information retrieval.

  • Real-Time Search: Enables instant access to relevant information.

  • Large-Scale Data: Efficiently handles extensive datasets for seamless search operations.

# ScaNN Applications

The Scalable Nearest Neighbors (ScaNN) algorithm excels in tasks that demand fast vector queries (opens new window) and efficient indexing processes. By optimizing the search for similar vectors on a large scale, ScaNN enhances the speed and accuracy of nearest neighbor searches. Its innovative techniques make it an ideal choice for applications requiring swift data retrieval and streamlined indexing.

  • Fast Vector Queries: Provides rapid access to similar vectors.

  • Efficient Indexing: Optimizes the indexing process for enhanced query performance.


  • In summary, HNSW and ScaNN offer distinct advantages in nearest neighbor search algorithms. HNSW's scalable and efficient indexing method strengthens ScaNN's (opens new window) performance. The scalability of HNSW aligns well (opens new window) with the dataset size, enhancing search efficiency. For different scenarios, leveraging HNSW for large vectors and ScaNN for rapid indexing processes can optimize search tasks effectively. Ultimately, understanding the unique strengths of each algorithm is key to maximizing search performance in various applications.

Start building your Al projects with MyScale today

Free Trial
Contact Us